It’s time to look at the evidence

June 30, 2022

Change is afoot and, as Professor of Conservation Biology, Bill Sutherland is excited about it. But there’s a problem: even with the best of intentions, many conservation projects fail. Many mangrove restoration schemes have failed due to planting in the wrong place, or lack of community engagement. Unsuccessful conservation projects are not just a waste of time – they’re a waste of money, and a failure to protect the plants and animals that are becoming increasingly threatened across the globe. His hope is that all future decision-making in conservation will be based on the best available evidence, just as it is in medicine.

Change is afoot and, as Professor of Conservation Biology, Bill Sutherland is excited about it.

Funding for the environment is on the rise, with governments and businesses becoming increasingly aware of the need to act, and quickly, to protect our natural world so that it can protect us.

But there’s a problem: even with the best of intentions, many conservation projects fail.

The UK Government has recently committed to spending at least £3 billion to protect and restore nature and biodiversity, and change farming practices through environmental land management schemes. It also hopes to leverage up to £90 billion of private investment by 2030, to facilitate the Net Zero Strategy for a more sustainable future. And the Bezos Earth Fund has pledged to spend $10 billion by the end of the decade. 

Sutherland says there’s a very real chance that much of this money potentially billions of pounds could be wasted because conservation projects are not based on activities that have been proven to work, but on "frequently biased" beliefs which are often wrong.

A review of decades of expensive tree planting programmes in northern India showed they hadn’t been effective. Many mangrove restoration schemes have failed due to planting in the wrong place, or lack of community engagement. Unsuccessful conservation projects are not just a waste of time – they’re a waste of money, and a failure to protect the plants and animals that are becoming increasingly threatened across the globe.

“There’s been no feedback mechanism in conservation. In medicine, cases are reviewed and if they didn’t go well, doctors try to work out why, and are held accountable – the field has been transformed by using evidence of what works.”

Professor Bill Sutherland

Drawing on the analogy, Sutherland is spearheading a revolution in the way conservation projects are planned. His hope is that all future decision-making in conservation will be based on the best available evidence, just as it is in medicine. And that this will result in better outcomes for the nature we’re trying to protect.

The source of this news is from University of Cambridge

Popular in Research

China is using the world's largest online disinformation operation to harass Americans

Nov 15, 2023

Child sexual abuse survivors lend their voice to support others

Nov 15, 2023

Print on demand business with Printseekers.com

Sep 6, 2022

Cost of living pressures sees social cohesion hit record low

Nov 15, 2023

Professor Emeritus Walter Hollister, an expert in flight instrumentation and guidance, dies at 92

Nov 15, 2023

Cool Course: City as Text

Nov 15, 2023